The multi-program performance model: debunking current practice in multi-core simulation

Composing a representative multi-program multi-core workload is non-trivial. A multi-core processor can execute multiple independent programs concurrently, and hence, any program mix can form a potential multi-program workload. Given the very large number of possible multiprogram workloads and the limited speed of current simulation methods, it is impossible to evaluate all possible multi-program workloads. This paper presents the Multi-Program Performance Model (MPPM), a method for quickly estimating multiprogram multi-core performance based on single-core simulation runs. MPPM employs an iterative method to model the tight performance entanglement between co-executing programs on a multi-core processor with shared caches. Because MPPM involves analytical modeling, it is very fast, and it estimates multi-core performance for a very large number of multi-program workloads in a reasonable amount of time. In addition, it provides confidence bounds on its performance estimates. Using SPEC CPU2006 and up to 16 cores, we report an average performance prediction error of 2.3% and 2.9% for system throughput (STP) and average normalized turnaround time (ANTT), respectively, while being up to five orders of magnitude faster than detailed simulation. Subsequently, we demonstrate that randomly picking a limited number of multi-program workloads, as done in current pactice, can lead to incorrect design decisions in practical design and research studies, which is alleviated using MPPM. In addition, MPPM can be used to quickly identify multi-program workloads that stress multi-core performance through excessive conflict behavior in shared caches; these stress workloads can then be used for driving the design process further

Modeling and scheduling heterogeneous multi-core architectures

Om de prestatie van toekomstige processors en processorarchitecturen te evalueren wordt vaak gebruik gemaakt van een simulator die het gedrag en de prestatie van de processor modelleert. De prestatie bepalen van de uitvoering van een computerprogramma op een gegeven processorarchitectuur m.b.v. een simulator duurt echter vele grootteordes langer dan de werkelijke uitvoeringstijd. Dit beperkt in belangrijke mate de hoeveelheid experimenten die gedaan kunnen worden. In dit doctoraatswerk werd het Multi-Program Performance Model (MPPM) ontwikkeld, een innovatief alternatief voor traditionele simulatie, dat het mogelijk maakt om tot 100.000x sneller een processorconfiguratie te evalueren. MPPM laat ons toe om nooit geziene exploraties te doen. Gebruik makend van dit raamwerk hebben we aangetoond dat de taakplanning cruciaal is om heterogene meerkernige processors optimaal te benutten. Vervolgens werd een nieuwe manier voorgesteld om op een schaalbare manier de taakplanning uit te voeren, namelijk Performance Impact Estimation (PIE). Tijdens de uitvoering van een draad op een gegeven processorkern schatten we de prestatie op een ander type kern op basis van eenvoudig op te meten prestatiemetrieken. Zo beschikken we op elk moment over alle nodige informatie om een efficiënte taakplanning te doen. Dit laat ons bovendien toe te optimaliseren voor verschillende criteria zoals uitvoeringstijd, doorvoersnelheid of fairness

BarrierPoint: sampled simulation of multi-threaded applications

Sampling is a well-known technique to speed up architectural simulation of long-running workloads while maintaining accurate performance predictions. A number of sampling techniques have recently been developed that extend well- known single-threaded techniques to allow sampled simulation of multi-threaded applications. Unfortunately, prior work is limited to non-synchronizing applications (e.g., server throughput workloads); requires the functional simulation of the entire application using a detailed cache hierarchy which limits the overall simulation speedup potential; leads to different units of work across different processor architectures which complicates performance analysis; or, requires massive machine resources to achieve reasonable simulation speedups. In this work, we propose BarrierPoint, a sampling methodology to accelerate simulation by leveraging globally synchronizing barriers in multi-threaded applications. BarrierPoint collects microarchitecture-independent code and data signatures to determine the most representative inter-barrier regions, called barrierpoints. BarrierPoint estimates total application execution time (and other performance metrics of interest) through detailed simulation of these barrierpoints only, leading to substantial simulation speedups. Barrierpoints can be simulated in parallel, use fewer simulation resources, and define fixed units of work to be used in performance comparisons across processor architectures. Our evaluation of BarrierPoint using NPB and Parsec benchmarks reports average simulation speedups of 24.7x (and up to 866.6x) with an average simulation error of 0.9% and 2.9% at most. On average, BarrierPoint reduces the number of simulation machine resources needed by 78x

Fairness-aware scheduling on single-ISA heterogeneous multi-cores

Single-ISA heterogeneous multi-cores consisting of small (e.g., in-order) and big (e.g., out-of-order) cores dramatically improve energy- and power-efficiency by scheduling workloads on the most appropriate core type. A significant body of recent work has focused on improving system throughput through scheduling. However, none of the prior work has looked into fairness. Yet, guaranteeing that all threads make equal progress on heterogeneous multi-cores is of utmost importance for both multi-threaded and multi-program workloads to improve performance and quality-of-service. Furthermore, modern operating systems affinitize workloads to cores (pinned scheduling) which dramatically affects fairness on heterogeneous multi-cores. In this paper, we propose fairness-aware scheduling for single-ISA heterogeneous multi-cores, and explore two flavors for doing so. Equal-time scheduling runs each thread or workload on each core type for an equal fraction of the time, whereas equal-progress scheduling strives at getting equal amounts of work done on each core type. Our experimental results demonstrate an average 14% (and up to 25%) performance improvement over pinned scheduling through fairness-aware scheduling for homogeneous multi-threaded workloads; equal-progress scheduling improves performance by 32% on average for heterogeneous multi-threaded workloads. Further, we report dramatic improvements in fairness over prior scheduling proposals for multi-program workloads, while achieving system throughput comparable to throughput-optimized scheduling, and an average 21% improvement in throughput over pinned scheduling

Automatic SMT threading for OpenMP applications on the Intel Xeon Phi co-processor

Simultaneous multithreading is a technique that can improve performance when running parallel applications on the Intel Xeon Phi co-processor. Selecting the most efficient thread count is however non-trivial, as the potential increase in efficiency has to be balanced against other, potentially negative factors such as inter-thread competition for cache capacity and increased synchronization overheads. In this paper, we extend CRUST (ClusteR-aware Under-subscribed Scheduling of Threads), a technique for finding the optimum thread count of OpenMP applications running on clustered cache architectures, to take the behavior of simultaneous multithreading on the Xeon Phi into account. CRUST can automatically find the optimum thread count at sub-application granularity by exploiting application phase behavior at OpenMP parallel section boundaries, and uses hardware performance counter information to gain insight into the application's behavior. We implement a CRUST prototype inside the Intel OpenMP runtime library and show its efficiency running on real Xeon Phi hardware

Understanding Fundamental Design Choices in Single-ISA Heterogeneous Multicore Architectures

Single-ISA heterogeneous multicore processors have gained substantial interest over the past few years because of their power efficiency, as they offer the potential for high overall chip throughput within a given power budget. Prior work in heterogeneous architectures has mainly focused on how heterogeneity can improve overall system throughput. To what extent heterogeneity affects per-program performance has remained largely unanswered. In this article, we aim at understanding how heterogeneity affects both chip throughput and per-program performance; how heterogeneous architectures compare to homogeneous architectures under both performance metrics; and how fundamental design choices, such as core type, cache size, and off-chip bandwidth, affect performance. We use analytical modeling to explore a large space of single-ISA heterogeneous architectures. The analytical model has linear-time complexity in the number of core types and programs of interest, and offers a unique opportunity for exploring the large space of both homogeneous and heterogeneous multicore processors in limited time. Our analysis provides several interesting insights: While it is true that heterogeneity can improve system throughput, it fundamentally trades per-program performance for chip throughput; although some heterogeneous configurations yield better throughput and per-program performance than homogeneous designs, some homogeneous configurations are optimal for particular throughput versus perprogra

Node performance and energy analysis with the sniper multi-core simulator

Two major trends in high-performance computing, namely, larger numbers of cores and the growing size of on-chip cache memory, are creating significant challenges for evaluating the design space of future processor architectures. Fast and scalable simulations are therefore needed to allow for sufficient exploration of large multi-core systems within a limited simulation time budget. By bringing together accurate high-abstraction analytical models with fast parallel simulation, architects can trade off accuracy with simulation speed to allow for longer application runs, covering a larger portion of the hardware design space. Sniper provides this balance allowing long-running simulations to be modeled much faster than with detailed cycle-accurate simulation, while still providing the detail necessary to observe core-uncore interactions across the entire system. With per-function advanced visualization and coupled power and energy simulations, the Sniper multi-core simulator can provide a fast and accurate way both to understand and optimize software for current and future hardware systems

Node performance and energy analysis with the sniper multi-core simulator

Two major trends in high-performance computing, namely, larger numbers of cores and the growing size of on-chip cache memory, are creating significant challenges for evaluating the design space of future processor architectures. Fast and scalable simulations are there- fore needed to allow for sufficient exploration of large multi-core systems within a limited simulation time budget. By bringing together accurate high-abstraction analytical models with fast parallel simulation, architects can trade off accuracy with simulation speed to allow for longer application runs, covering a larger portion of the hardware design space. Sniper provides this balance allowing long-running simulations to be modeled much faster than with detailed cycle-accurate simulation, while still providing the detail necessary to observe core-uncore interactions across the entire system. With per-function advanced visualization and coupled power and energy simulations, the Sniper multi-core simulator can provide a fast and accurate way both to understand and optimize software for current and future hardware systems

Boosting the priority of garbage: scheduling collection on heterogeneous multicore processors

While hardware is evolving toward heterogeneous multicore architectures, modern software applications are increasingly written in managed languages. Heterogeneity was born of a need to improve energy efficiency; however, we want the performance of our applications not to suffer from limited resources. How best to schedule managed language applications on a mix of big, out-of-order cores and small, in-order cores is an open question, complicated by the host of service threads that perform key tasks such as memory management. These service threads compete with the application for core and memory resources, and garbage collection (GC) must sometimes suspend the application if there is not enough memory available for allocation. In this article, we explore concurrent garbage collection’s behavior, particularly when it becomes critical, and how to schedule it on a heterogeneous system to optimize application performance. While some applications see no difference in performance when GC threads are run on big versus small cores, others—those with GC criticality—see up to an 18% performance improvement. We develop a new, adaptive scheduling algorithm that responds to GC criticality signals from the managed runtime, giving more big-core cycles to the concurrent collector when it is under pressure and in danger of suspending the application. Our experimental results show that our GC-criticality-aware scheduler is robust across a range of heterogeneous architectures with different core counts and frequency scaling and across heap sizes. Our algorithm is performance and energy neutral for GC-uncritical Java applications and significantly speeds up GC-critical applications by 16%, on average, while being 20% more energy efficient for a heterogeneous multicore with three big cores and one small core